• mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    fo sho if you’re going to compare it to bart, which is like, 50 years of concerted civil engineering to the last two decades here in Seattle, it’s gonna fall short. Bart’s an impressive outlier in commitment to the problem.

    • Doug Holland@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      BART was pretty impressive too, but I was mostly thinking of San Francisco’s Municipal Railway (Muni). It’s about 110 years old, and ran eight routes, cable car and light rail, when I lived there in the '00s (they’ve added a few routes since then). I didn’t have a car, and Muni took me everywhere inside the city, pretty reliably. Sure, you could count on a meltdown of the system every month or two, but Sound Transit is only 15 years old, too young to be as rickety and unreliable as it is. And it still flabbergasts me that no heads rolled over the bridge fiasco for the 2-line.

      Not trying to be argumentative. Big fan of public transit. I live in Seattle and don’t own a car. Sound Transit needs to be better, is all.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        San Francisco’s Municipal Railway

        muni is hella awesome too, it’s a great example of how not kneecapping things in the early 1900s changes the equation.

        I wish ST was better, but I have limited expectations moving here from a red state.