korendian@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 hours agoPixelfed user count has gone vertical.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square134fedilinkarrow-up1599arrow-down134cross-posted to: forumlibre
arrow-up1565arrow-down1imagePixelfed user count has gone vertical.lemmy.worldkorendian@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 hours agomessage-square134fedilinkcross-posted to: forumlibre
minus-squareSabin10@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·edit-214 hours agoIsn’t that a 1‰ growth or am I mathing wrong? Edit: I’m wrong and that’s why I shouldn’t comment first thing in the morning. The math is mathing, I’m just not braining.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-215 hours agoYou are mathing wrong. The GP is correct, except for the fact that it applies to the Y axis. (… it’s a much smaller change on the X axis anyway, something with 10 zeros before the first non-zero digit…)
minus-squareiAmTheTot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·15 hours agoOne percent of 300,000 would be 3,000.
Isn’t that a 1‰ growth or am I mathing wrong?
Edit: I’m wrong and that’s why I shouldn’t comment first thing in the morning. The math is mathing, I’m just not braining.
You are mathing wrong. The GP is correct, except for the fact that it applies to the Y axis.
(… it’s a much smaller change on the X axis anyway, something with 10 zeros before the first non-zero digit…)
Its ~12%
One percent of 300,000 would be 3,000.