In defence to this, I didn’t respect the rules, that’s doesn’t mean the rules are fair, their are favoured towards the common tend of scams Luigi1111 pulls of to claim CSS and Bounty funds fraudulently even when work is completed. There is sufficenient evidence the work was though, finally completed as requested yet the milestone payout was refused, therefore, there is now a split team from core. Our team works more on the actual app being usable outside of a desktop environment, which is tremendously more useful, it’s still FOSS, it’s no loss to the community at all actually, everything that’s promised is still intended to be delivered, this will be clearer soon. However we are withholding code now just as the monero core team have withholded funds, just so that we take precendence we we release our hard work, since I’m now working with some members of the Tor project and Tail development team, who have a very good reputation, upon release you’ll firstly find it’s all open source and available to use to connect or create any network in a federated and decentralised manner, very easily. This is not possible with the classic haveno development, but we give credit to woodser for he efforts and should our project recieve any donations he will for sure be included as a 30% benefactor. Our work is being completed at https://haveno.com/ rather than https://haveno.exchange/ (which we use some of code from on desktop, not mobile), which is an important distinction, this is perhaps part of the reason the Monero core team decided not to pay our milestone, because we started to gain precedence for our work outside of the scope of the CCS and were threatened of losing market share for internal competing projects they are running such as BasicSwapDEX.com which despite being useless is somehow listed on getmonero.org as a link, weird huh? If you don’t think that’s strange especially after the fact I’ll admit the SeraiDEX, is better than what we are working on, that should for sure be listed on getmonero.org but is subject to significant scrutiny despite clearly being a better codebase than basicswapdex.com. The reason I mention this so randomly is the Luigi1111 is involved in these CCS fund laundering schemes just as he was when he stole 2000 XMR from the General Fund (the main reason fluffypony decided to petition disband core) because let’s be real, he doesn’t need to steal fund. So while yes there are speculations as to why perhaps I should not receive the remaining CSS bounty as promised, we ultimately still did and are still doing the work. So if it’s really the community that want’s this they should stick with us and not against us, either way we know the value provided by our team will be useful enough the whether you like us or hate us you’ll still prefer using out product overall, just the same way to use your fiat banks or Binance, we’re just trying to make finance a better subject for everyone, that’s really it.
When you sign a contract with a client that asks you to do something, you either do it in the ways described by the contract, or you don’t and don’t get paid. You have no say in how you should work.
Find the rules unfair? Don’t apply to CCS then.
You don’t have to say anything more. You’re in the wrong. You lied, you didn’t fulfilf your promises. That’s it.
You publish source and respect the rules, you get paid. Easy, right?
Yet you didn’t publish the source and didn’t respect the rules, so don’t complain you didn’t get paid.
In defence to this, I didn’t respect the rules, that’s doesn’t mean the rules are fair, their are favoured towards the common tend of scams Luigi1111 pulls of to claim CSS and Bounty funds fraudulently even when work is completed. There is sufficenient evidence the work was though, finally completed as requested yet the milestone payout was refused, therefore, there is now a split team from core. Our team works more on the actual app being usable outside of a desktop environment, which is tremendously more useful, it’s still FOSS, it’s no loss to the community at all actually, everything that’s promised is still intended to be delivered, this will be clearer soon. However we are withholding code now just as the monero core team have withholded funds, just so that we take precendence we we release our hard work, since I’m now working with some members of the Tor project and Tail development team, who have a very good reputation, upon release you’ll firstly find it’s all open source and available to use to connect or create any network in a federated and decentralised manner, very easily. This is not possible with the classic haveno development, but we give credit to woodser for he efforts and should our project recieve any donations he will for sure be included as a 30% benefactor. Our work is being completed at https://haveno.com/ rather than https://haveno.exchange/ (which we use some of code from on desktop, not mobile), which is an important distinction, this is perhaps part of the reason the Monero core team decided not to pay our milestone, because we started to gain precedence for our work outside of the scope of the CCS and were threatened of losing market share for internal competing projects they are running such as BasicSwapDEX.com which despite being useless is somehow listed on getmonero.org as a link, weird huh? If you don’t think that’s strange especially after the fact I’ll admit the SeraiDEX, is better than what we are working on, that should for sure be listed on getmonero.org but is subject to significant scrutiny despite clearly being a better codebase than basicswapdex.com. The reason I mention this so randomly is the Luigi1111 is involved in these CCS fund laundering schemes just as he was when he stole 2000 XMR from the General Fund (the main reason fluffypony decided to petition disband core) because let’s be real, he doesn’t need to steal fund. So while yes there are speculations as to why perhaps I should not receive the remaining CSS bounty as promised, we ultimately still did and are still doing the work. So if it’s really the community that want’s this they should stick with us and not against us, either way we know the value provided by our team will be useful enough the whether you like us or hate us you’ll still prefer using out product overall, just the same way to use your fiat banks or Binance, we’re just trying to make finance a better subject for everyone, that’s really it.
When you sign a contract with a client that asks you to do something, you either do it in the ways described by the contract, or you don’t and don’t get paid. You have no say in how you should work.
Find the rules unfair? Don’t apply to CCS then.
You don’t have to say anything more. You’re in the wrong. You lied, you didn’t fulfilf your promises. That’s it.