The Powerball jackpot has soared to an estimated $1.04 billion after no tickets matched all six numbers in Saturday night’s drawing.

Saturday night’s drawing produced white balls 19, 30, 37, 44 and 46 and red Powerball 22.

The $1.04 billion prize – an estimated $478.2 million in cash value – is the second-largest jackpot this year, topped only by a $1.08 billion prize won on July 19 by a ticketholder in California.

  • bloopernova@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If I win I’ll give everyone in this thread a million dollars.

    So, if there’s 60 people in the thread, everyone gets $16,667

    I see you all fell for my cunning ruse. Definitely not something I figured out after I posted. Not at all.

  • DadWagonDriver@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    So are PowerBall and Mega Millions now rigged to make sure that the jackpot always hits $1B before a winner is drawn?

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      Rigged in the sense that they intentionally made the odds so long as to almost ensure it would routinely go weeks and weeks without a winner. So yes, it is by design.

      • guyrocket@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They changed this some years ago. Odds used to be better, they made them worse on purpose to get bigger jackpots.

        Which makes it less worthwhile to play, IMHO. Odds were horrible before the change and now they’re WORSE? No thanks.

        ETA: I have not done it in a while, but I might buy a ticket for fun. It is worth a few dollars just to dream a little.

        • HooPhuckenKarez@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I bought a Powerball ticket the first time it hit a billion. I found out why later that day. I knew it was a waste to begin with, but it kinda pissed me off. 2006ish(?), turns out making the odds even worse drives up jackpot.

        • perviouslyiner@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So is it optimal strategy to never play on a new (non rolled over) session? Seems like a bit of a prisoners’ dilemma if everyone realises that

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I imagine their sales go up fast when so-called “news” outlets (like this community) report that it’s hit that level.

      Never mind that it makes your already infinitesimal odds of winning even smaller, when the regular jackpot would already be a life-changing amount of money. People who only buy tickets when the jackpot goes up are just falling even harder for the scam than those who buy when the jackpot is “low”.

      • evatronic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The odds of winning don’t change based on the number of people who buy tickets.

      • canni@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The expected value of a ticket goes up. At some point it’s higher than the cost of the ticket.

      • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The odds of winning are always the same, so why are the ones buying tickets less often falling for the scam harder? It’s dumb too, but conceptually speaking it’s a better return on investment if you win somehow.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was told years ago when I worked at a convince store our loto rep said white balls coming out of the machine are fake it never random. They decide when it pays out. He claims it only pays out when they earn double what will be paid out. This back when loto got up to like 4 million. So they would earn 8 and then give the illusion that the white balls came out and gave a winner.

      He says they preload the winning numbers. Since it all electronic they can keep people from winning for as long as they want because they know all numbers submitted.

  • PixTupy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not American, please explain, why is the cash value only 478.2 million? Is that after taxes or something?

    • flipht@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. They withhold taxes, and at that point it’s all in the highest bracket, and you haven’t had the cash to get a bunch of credits and deductions.

      Some lotteries offer an annuity style payout, over 20 years. This can reduce the tax implications over the whole life, but inflation and not having the money invested can eat it up.

      It’s a trade off that would be great to have to worry about.

      • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The taxes are not included in that figure. That’s the actual prize pool money they’d have on hand in case of a win. The advertised jackpot is an estimate of an annuity paid off investing that prize pool in securities over the course of 30 years

        The lottery will withhold 24% for federal income tax – but you’d likely owe more as the vast majority of that income will wind up taxed at 37%. Then there’s also state income taxes in most places.

        If I win this jackpot and take the lump sum it would break down something like:

        $478,200,000

        -$33,474,000 (7% state tax)

        -$176,898,427 (37% federal tax)

        = $267,827,573 (total after tax)

    • bloopernova@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      2 things: taxes are taken from the winnings, and the jackpot quoted is the amount you would get if you picked the regular payments rather than lump sum.

      The regular payments include trust fund interest/growth I think, so you get more.

      It’s confusing as all hell. I’d much prefer it tax free and lump sum. Tell me exactly what I get, don’t dress it up to make it look better than it is!

      • gregorum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The tax-free annuity payment version is by far the better deal. But some people elect to get the lump sum in cash, and you end up getting far less than half of it, esp after taxes.

        • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The annuity isn’t tax free. You pay taxes on that income every year just like (and in addition to) any other income you have.

          Also, you could most likely beat the rate of return on those investments if you know what you’re doing. But on the other hand most lottery winners won’t know what they’re doing. Additionally the annuity can be a stopgap to keep you from losing everything all at once.

          • Ryumast3r@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Even if you know what you’re doing, you’ll probably go bankrupt after winning. Annuity is, as you said, a stopgap against stupidity.

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The taxes a far far less, though, and the total sum is far greater.

            As for the rest, that’s all speculation. None of that is guaranteed. That annuity is guaranteed.

            • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The taxes are far less on a yearly basis, but over the course of the annuity you’ll actually pay a lot more in taxes. Rough calculation, if I won this jackpot it would break down to:

              • Lump sum: Immediate payment of $478.2M with a tax bill of around $210M for my state and Federal income taxes. Net payout of $267.8M.

              • Annuity: $1.04B paid over 30 years. At current tax rates that’s a bill of $456.5M over that 30 years. Net payout of around $583.5M. If tax rates change during the term of the annuity those could rise or fall a bit.

              Not like I’ll ever have to worry about the problem,but I think I would take the annuity because I’ve never had to manage a large amount of money, and it more gently eases you into it while giving some buffer to assure you don’t somehow blow through everything quickly.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          This has never been true. If u take the annuity they take the lump and invest that and instead of getting the full profits of that investment you get the same flat rate every year.

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can’t guarantee profits from an investment. That’s just a gamble. However, you can guarantee the gigantic amount of taxes they will deduct from it, and you’re only getting half as much from the cash payout anyway.

        • JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you get the lump sum though that’s a large amount growing when invested. You can easily take that and grow it into more than you’d get over time from the payments.

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not a guaranteed payout. The annuity payments, however, is. Plus, with a lump sum, Pam, you get hammered huge amounts of taxes.

            • JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If it takes you longer than 30 years to turn $200m into $1.08b then my friend you have a poor financial advisor. Also by then the $1.08b won’t be worth the same, considering inflation.

    • tea@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. That’s $1.04b taken from the pockets mostly people who should be trying to put it to savings, not giving away money on a pipedream. Giving it to a winner who statistically will likely have their life ruined by such a windfall.

      It’s goddam stupid. The “causes” the lottery pays back to, like education, should be funded by taxing those who don’t need the extra money, not by duping people who desperately need every dollar they earn.

    • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oddly enough not entirely. Yes it is a total waste of money to buy a ticket, but I remembered hearing a piece a while back that broke down why the poor bought the majority of tickets. Basically it broke down to the fact that they knew there was no chance of them ever getting out of poverty without some major windfall event. They know that there is no real chance of winning, but sadly it was the closest thing to hope they had. They aren’t stupid just desperate.

  • HooPhuckenKarez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hurry up chucklefucks, get out there and pay your stupid tax! Bonus points for holding up the line, during the afternoon rush, at an already busy gas station.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You get three darts to throw at the balloons and if you hit all three you get a prize. No, not the giant bear. Never the giant bear.

  • guyrocket@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know they give you the odds of winning with one ticket but what are the odds of winning with 10 tickets? It is not as simple as multiplying by 10, is it?

    Long ago I was part of a lottery pool and we never really won anything. Just wondering if this has better odds than going on your own.

    • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, it’s as easy as multiplying by 10 for this kind of lottery. Let’s say you have to pick three numbers correctly. There’s 1000 possibilities (000 - 999). A random 3 digit string has a 1/1000 chance of winning. That’s close enough for most purposes. If you want to get really pedantic about it, you can say that with one ticket picked from a pool of 1000 (eg 123) you have a .999 chance of losing. Your second ticket is now picking from a pool of 999 possibilities, so the chance of picking the winner slightly increases to 1/999. The difference between doing the math that way and just multiplying the chance of a winning ticket by the number of tickets you buy is very small, though. There’s other lottery styles (eg, where the winning number is picked from a group of sold tickets, so a winner is guaranteed), where the math changes.

      What you really want to do is figure out the expected value of a ticket. If there’s 1000 possible numbers and a $1000 prize, the tickets are worth &1. If they’re selling for $2 each, it’s not worth it. If they’re selling for $0.50 each, it’s worth buying them all. There was an investment group of friends that used to do this by searching the internet for lotteries. You just have to realize that it’s the kind of gamble that will pay off over time and not martingale yourself.

    • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s 1:292.2 million, so 10 tickets is 1:29.22 million. There are theories about buying all 292.2 million numbers, but the issue always comes back to not being alone in the pool; you will win, but if someone else wins (or did the same thing), you will lose a few million for all your hard work.

      Edit: also the tickets are now $2, so buying all numbers is still more expensive than the prize after taxes.

  • autumn_rain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    😆 The last lottery ticket I bought was 38 years ago. I regreted throwing away a dollar it’s too traumatic.

  • buzz86us@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why do they even bother announcing so much money when we all know taxes are like 40%… what even is the point of announcing such a high figure? Like the government is just paying themselves at this point so why bother taxing it. To provide further dilution you have to accept an annuity to even approach getting all the money.