SSTF@lemmy.world to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agoIt's insidiouslemmy.worldimagemessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1515arrow-down13cross-posted to: tenforward@lemmy.world
arrow-up1512arrow-down1imageIt's insidiouslemmy.worldSSTF@lemmy.world to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agomessage-square59fedilinkcross-posted to: tenforward@lemmy.world
minus-squareDeconceptualist@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 month agoIt’s not TIFF. This isn’t NASA imagery. PNGs do alright on compression for photos. (at least I hope NASA hasn’t captured images of Quark)
minus-squarePhoenixz@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoPNG can zip but it’s lossless, joh can lose data, and the difference is very significant
minus-squareuser134450@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 month agoTIFF is also such a hot mess when it comes to picking the correct subformat because there are so many options for compression available, some of them FOSS, some of them proprietary. Edit: … and most of them quite dated.
It’s not TIFF. This isn’t NASA imagery. PNGs do alright on compression for photos.
(at least I hope NASA hasn’t captured images of Quark)
PNG can zip but it’s lossless, joh can lose data, and the difference is very significant
TIFF is also such a hot mess when it comes to picking the correct subformat because there are so many options for compression available, some of them FOSS, some of them proprietary. Edit: … and most of them quite dated.