🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agoAnon tries to manipulate Tindersh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1471arrow-down149
arrow-up1422arrow-down1imageAnon tries to manipulate Tindersh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agomessage-square67fedilink
minus-squarePsythik@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·20 hours agoI thought it was common knowledge that the pickier you are on Tinder, the better your matches will be. Swipe right on everyone and you won’t have much luck on that app.
minus-squareAnivia@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-26 hours agoIt’s no longer determined by your swiping behavior, but rather who swipes left or right on your profile, and their elo. If you only get swiped right by people with a low elo, then your elo will drop and your profile will only be shown to people with a low elo. Vice versa, if a lot of people with high elo swipe right on your profile you will receive a higher elo and be show to profiles with a high elo If it was determined by who you swipe right on it would be too easy to game the system
minus-squarechemical_cutthroat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 day agoLike when they discriminated against users because of their age…
minus-squareAnivia@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 hours agoThey still do that, and it’s no secret.
minus-squareXIIIesq@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·edit-21 day agoA quick Google shows that they charged over thirties in the UK double for a premium account. Devils advocate says that is because older people are more like to have money (people are probably getting a bit more desperate at that age too). It looks like the policy is revoked tho.
minus-squaresunzu2@thebrainbin.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·14 hours agoWe should charge people based on their ability to pay for food too!
minus-squareXIIIesq@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 hours agoWe do it for taxes and in my opinion, it doesn’t go far enough.
minus-squaresunzu2@thebrainbin.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·5 hours agoWe really don’t… It is progressive only for people who work for money 🤡 up to few hundred k
Tinder has that?
I thought it was common knowledge that the pickier you are on Tinder, the better your matches will be. Swipe right on everyone and you won’t have much luck on that app.
It’s no longer determined by your swiping behavior, but rather who swipes left or right on your profile, and their elo.
If you only get swiped right by people with a low elo, then your elo will drop and your profile will only be shown to people with a low elo.
Vice versa, if a lot of people with high elo swipe right on your profile you will receive a higher elo and be show to profiles with a high elo
If it was determined by who you swipe right on it would be too easy to game the system
It’s a secret
Like when they discriminated against users because of their age…
They still do that, and it’s no secret.
Gaetz: flips table
A quick Google shows that they charged over thirties in the UK double for a premium account.
Devils advocate says that is because older people are more like to have money (people are probably getting a bit more desperate at that age too).
It looks like the policy is revoked tho.
We should charge people based on their ability to pay for food too!
We do it for taxes and in my opinion, it doesn’t go far enough.
We really don’t… It is progressive only for people who work for money 🤡 up to few hundred k