• tiredOfFascists@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So you learned enough about the history of computing to make claims like this, but not enough to know that practically all the first programmers were female and some even pioneered theory, techniques, and languages? For example Grace Hopper, who you are erasing from history here.

    I call bullshit. Either you purposely ignore these facts, or your sexism prevented them from being remembered when you learned them.

    • ElmAndYew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget Ada Lovelace, the first computer engineer and the namesake of the Ada programming language.

      • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        She was a okay mathematician that did indeed “get” Babbages nonexistent machine (I forgot the name of it, analytic engine?). She wrote incredibly simple software for it. Who knows what she would have accomplished if she had a proper computer, but she didn’t and we’ll never know.

        In the immediate Postwar years there were indeed some gifted women in the field, but they were never the majority.

      • tiredOfFascists@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is a reason several people have pointed out facts to you. You clearly want to deny the fact that women were very much a part of computer ENGINEERING

          • tiredOfFascists@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re just being pedantic. Women were extremely pivotal in the creation of computing [insert more specific subfields if you want, doesn’t change anything]. Your comments certainly all read as refuting this. It’s not controversial to the non-incel community.

              • tiredOfFascists@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh so then perhaps you can link to these 1940-1960 statistics that somehow neatly and consistently segmented out computing roles into easy to define categories despite the fact that it was a new field and the lines between subfields were and always have been changing? Got a link handy?