mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 2 months agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1200arrow-down12cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.setechnology@lemmit.onlinecpp@programming.dev
arrow-up1198arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square56fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.setechnology@lemmit.onlinecpp@programming.dev
minus-squareTehPers@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-22 months agoIf you’re hoping for the standard lib to have things built on evolving standards and ecosystems like HTTP clients, then I doubt that will ever happen. There are plenty of examples of why that would be a terrible idea (urllib, std::regex, etc).
If you’re hoping for the standard lib to have things built on evolving standards and ecosystems like HTTP clients, then I doubt that will ever happen. There are plenty of examples of why that would be a terrible idea (
urllib,std::regex, etc).