mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 1 month agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1200arrow-down12cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.setechnology@lemmit.onlinecpp@programming.dev
arrow-up1198arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square56fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.setechnology@lemmit.onlinecpp@programming.dev
minus-squareTroy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoThis gets even more complex if you’re using a toolkit of some sort. C++ has a batteries-included way of doing something, then STL has another, and Qt yet another… Etc.
This gets even more complex if you’re using a toolkit of some sort. C++ has a batteries-included way of doing something, then STL has another, and Qt yet another… Etc.