cross-posted from: https://quokk.au/post/590118

During a video address directed at the people of Lebanon, Netanyahu said: "You have an opportunity to save Lebanon before it falls into the abyss of a long war that will lead to destruction and suffering like we see in Gaza.

  • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Let me explain how we can prove you’re 100% full of bullshit.

    If this had anything to do with security, bibi would resign, hand over reins to someone who didn’t fuck up and let the hostages be taken in the first place, and Israel could come up with plans slightly more nuanced and thought through than ‘Wauuugghh!!!’

    He’s desperate to keep power because hes Bibi, he’d use Iran getting nukes under his watch as an excuse for why he had to keep power, every failure from incompetence is just another argument for why he can’t possibly be replaced.

    You have a dictator, and it would be hilarious if it weren’t so tragic.

    • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      Your post makes me wonder which country you’re from, and how you’re so sure your neighbours can’t barge in with a few thousand soldiers and capture 250 hostages

      If you’re suggesting that pre-Al Aqsa Flood-Bibi was too weak on Gaza, then well… Yeah

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        America, we had a similar surprise once.

        Our reaction did not give us the assurance we desired.

        Bibi is a corrupt tool, he incited the assassination of Rabin and he’s basically a far smarter Trump.

        Israel is doomed because of him, because for such an ideologue security is fuel and he won’t let you stop until greater Israel or it’s complete destruction, there is no middle ground.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, funny how out of all countries the US didn’t go: “look, I get that you want revenge, but what we did after 9/11 wasn’t productive in the least, so we’re telling you to reconsider.”

          The US spent 20 years in Afghanistan, killed millions, traumatised/gave cancer to entire generations of their own soldiers and had nothing to show for it.

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You couldn’t be more wrong

            But I caution this: While you feel that rage, don’t be consumed by it.

            After 9/11, we were enraged in the United States. And while we sought justice and got justice, we also made mistakes.

            • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              We gave billions to the very country that supported the taliban and hid bin ladin for a decade.

              And we destroyed the middle east, causing the refugee crisis that is hitting the world and causing trouble.

              Not to mention we burned trillions.

              We were epic moroms, manipulated by assholes like Pakistan and Israel when all we should have done was what Obama did, put a few rounds in bin ladin and thrown him off the ship.

              • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Perhaps

                But a) chances are it wouldn’t have been so easy to just chopper in and out of Taliban-controlled Afghanistan to nab him, and b) it’s questionable that just killing one figurehead in retaliation for a massive terror attack that killed thousands wouldn’t just embolden them

                • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You’re reaching, hard.

                  There is no way in which the current outcome was better for the US than if we had simply eliminated OBL, all our responses after Afghanistan directly hurt us.

                  They actually hurt Israel too, even though theyre too stubborn and ignorant to appreciate it, we had a number of divided groups that would never move lest someone gain advantage, now we have Iran ascendant with no force to oppose them.

                  We gave Iraq to Iran, because Israel thought they could use us to mow down anyone they considered a problem, and because our president was a complete moron.

                  • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    I’d say you are the one who’s reaching (of the hard kind) if you think I’m going to argue about whether the US response was well done

                    I’m just here to point out that your statement that Biden didn’t use it as an example to warn the Israelis was utterly incorrect

                    Also, I think it’s quite funny that you think they could have just sent in some specops squad to walk around Afghanistan with a picture of OBL and they’d have him by the end of the week or something

        • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          They have nukes. During the cold war the nuclear option was the thing that terrified everyone. Israeli right now is a full blown Rogue state that abso-fucking-lutely will go nuclear if the US pulls support. Forget about the communist-capitalist thing, it’s about some crazed colonialist who believe they should have everything or no one has anything.

          • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            They won’t.

            They will go nuclear if they get in a desperate position, basically worse than the Yom Kippur War, but short of that they’re not going to bother, and they won’t get in that position, they’re too powerful and most of the middle east is still on fire.

            • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              If they got away with all this, they might also believe they can get away with a nuke. If they do they will cite the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings as justifications, saying that the Japanese didn’t surrender to massive firebombing the same way Arabs didn’t surrender to massive bombardment, and thus for both cases nukes are needed.

              This is, of course, monstrous and wrong.

              • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                You are doing the same thing they do, dehumanizing the other side.

                They’re not monsters just hungry for blood, they want the land, all of it, and are in a position that they feel pretty secure that none of their neighbors can seriously threaten them, thats why they’re acting how they are, not fear but secure in their ability to act without repercussion.

                Using a nuke is the equivalent of flipping the table when you’re losing, and they’re winning.

                Can I ask why you think they’re that stupid? Your suggestions show them as very childish actors when it comes to IR, which they haven’t shown any similar behavior in recent memory, they’ve been playing solid moves given their position.

                • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Using a nuke is the equivalent of flipping the table when you’re losing, and they’re winning.

                  That tells me everything I need to know about what kind of knowledge level you have about the matter.

                  • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    You’re the person who thinks Israel has any reason to use a nuke when they are the dominant conventional power in the region, AND have the full backing of the US, the greatest hyoerpower in human history.

                    I can’t even begin to understand your logic beyond ‘well they must be satan somehow’, there’s no rationale to it.

        • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          3 months ago

          The Land of America you say

          Do you think your leader is strong enough to prevent a few thousand Canadians from rushing the border for a few hours?

          • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            No, which is why it’s a good thing we aren’t occupying Toronto.

            Ironically we did invade and occupy Canada once because we thought we could take their land.

            It went very poorly for us, but unlike Israel we learned a lesson. Then again, we are capable of learning, but then again our politics weren’t completely founded on our most backwardly hyperreligious messianic nightmare psychos back then.

            Your zealots are a cancer on your polity, just like ours are. Palestinians didn’t butcher Rabin.

            • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Well, you’re going pretty off-topic from your original statement that Bibi should have been replaced with someone that could have prevented the hostage-takings.

              Also, you might want to read up on what happened to the natives that lived where you live now.

              • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Well, you’re going pretty off-topic from your original statement that Bibi should have been replaced with someone that could have prevented the hostage-takings.

                Do you think your leader is strong enough to prevent a few thousand Canadians from rushing the border for a few hours?

                I’m going off-topic?!?! Do you know how responses work?

                Also, you might want to read up on what happened to the natives that lived where you live now.

                Yeah, they were genocided, much like Israel is doing to the people who lived there. Not defending that in any way, we were monsters and we need to make what reparations we can to them and give them decent land even though it wouldn’t begin to make up.

                Much like Israel needs to accede to the original UN partition plan of 48, which they will never ever do because secretly most believe in a Greater Israel.

                • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Well that brings us to an interesting point

                  If you are unwilling to vacate from your clearly stolen land… Then why should the Israelis?

                  • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    We made a deal, under which they stopped attacking us.

                    Crying about terrorism and whatnot is adorable when you literally walked in and sat down on their couch without asking.