Shattered Pixel Dungeon- v2.5.2, desktop linux version from github

I am playing v2.5.2 on desktop instead of v2.5.3. This is mainly because I do not like the removal of the stone of disarming (and also because I do not like bombs, which seem too high-tech for medieval fantasy IMO). So it is possible that this issue was fixed on the desktop version of 2.5.3, if it is an issue. However, since I am on v2.5.2, I have not checked whether or not the behavior is the same on v2.5.3.

The journal cuts off floor 1 at the bottom of the screen. See the attached picture. Is this intended or unintended?

Thank you for your help.

  • leftascenter
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Your violent made me curious, learned bombs are 11th century.

    • Vencedor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      1st: that’s still medieval times 2nd: I said GUNPOWDER, not bombs. Bombs are made of gunpowder. Therefore, medieval bombs are possible. 3rd: Bombs are in other versions, so, I still don’t know what that has to do with not updating. 4th: my violent? What does that even mean?

      • leftascenter
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Chill dude.

        Violent: autocorrect from comment.

        1. My point.
        2. Get a life and stop being a jerk.
        3. Gunpowder is from the 9th century
        • Vencedor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          What point are you talking abt? When was I a jerk? As I alr said, 9th century are medieval times. Just because I disagreed with you (while you were actually wrong) doesn’t mean that I’m a jerk lmao. I didn’t call you dumb. Nor did I ever question your education. Why are you questioning me? Btw, that’s an ad hominem fallacy, which disproves your point entirely.