• lil_tank@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    • “uh my tap water doesn’t taste good”

    • “SO YOU’RE SAYING IT’S BETTER TO HAVE NO WATER AT ALL??? DEBUNKED AHAH”

    • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s because this person is a moron.

      They have no understanding of imperialism. The paper they are criticising is about unequal exchange in trade between global north and south countries. They think how anti-imperialists claim imperialism works is something like this: global south country harvests its natural resources to create wealth. This wealth then gets appropriated by the global north through unfair trade dealings.

      So they posit that if global south countries just didn’t trade with the global north, they could just keep their wealth and prosper. So sanctioned countries would actually get wealthier compared to non-sanctioned countries. Since this is obviously not true, (their strawman of) imperialism has been debunked.

  • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rejecting the concept of imperialism immediately discredits whatever you say especially in the topic of economics.

  • Addfwyn@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “this global south nonsense”.

    Does he not think those countries exist? Or does he disagree with the term, which goes back to at least the 60s as far as I am aware, he makes it sound like some kind of new communist propaganda.

    • Bloops@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      as a patriotic Kiwi I have no truck with this “Global South” nonsense

      No, he’s just racist and wants more settler colonies lol