• imecth@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sounds good to me. It’s annoying that connecting to a store and a social media platform has become so normalized. I just want to play a game.

      • Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s what I thought back in 2007. Now I kinda like the convenience. If they added an option to download the games, like GOG, it’d be perfect.

        Steam DRM is a joke anyways and not all games on steam have it, so it wouldn’t be that much of a stretch for them to get rid of it.

        • imecth@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s bloat, unnecessary junk that’s part of their ecosystem. Instead of having specialized apps, you have one app that does everything; and of course every other brand has to have their own, even fucking musk wants it for twitter.

          This creates two problems, first it strains your hardware for no reason, second it creates dozens of walled gardens that don’t interoperate, if you want to chat with your steam friends, you need to go on steam, if you want to play your games, you need to open the right launcher; this is the same shit apple is getting prosecuted for by the EU right now.

          • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            GoG is just as well. Epic, Ubishit, EA.

            Take a look at all of them and take the best choice for yourself. No monopoly, here. Steam isn’t paying EA and Ubisoft to suck. They’d suck if Valve existed or not.

            Steam isn’t the only choice for a gamer any more than a cheap Civic is the only choice for a poor college freshman.

            He could do a lot worse.

            • imecth@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              I mean, we definitely do have a steam monopoly on desktop, they might not be abusing their position much, as of yet anyways, but it’s a monopoly all the same. They captured the desktop playerbase in their little ecosystem and now people are stuck because of their game catalog, achievements, friend list…

              What we really need is a standardization of these systems and interoperability between platforms so that they’re forced to actually compete instead of being miles ahead just by virtue of being there first.

              • Teils13@lemmy.eco.br
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                For managing a library of videogames on the desktop, including integration with all available stores and local installs, there is Playnite for Windows and Lutris for Linux.

                • imecth@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Battle net only became a thing in like 2010, steam came very early in 2002, and started off straight away with exclusives that required you to install their client. They still do btw, there’s no portal, dota… on epic or whatever.