Centurion@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · edit-21 day agoIt could have been so easy lemmy.worldimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1381arrow-down134
arrow-up1347arrow-down1imageIt could have been so easy lemmy.worldCenturion@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · edit-21 day agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareoberstoffensichtlich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down1·1 day agoYou can reform the term until it reads x =
minus-squareoberstoffensichtlich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·edit-21 day agoLooks correct. However it’s only valid for n ≠ 0. B
minus-squareaffiliate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoif n = 0 then k = ∞ and just about any value of x works in this case. however x = arcsin(nk -1) still doesn’t work since 0 * ∞ is not defined. so i think the B grade is fair. (this is all assuming we’re working on the riemann sphere)
minus-squareradicalautonomy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-21 day agox = arcsin(nk-1) + z(2*pi), such that z is any integer.
You can reform the term until it reads x =
arcsin(nk-1) ?
Looks correct. However it’s only valid for n ≠ 0.
B
if n = 0 then k = ∞ and just about any value of x works in this case. however x = arcsin(nk -1) still doesn’t work since 0 * ∞ is not defined. so i think the B grade is fair.
(this is all assuming we’re working on the riemann sphere)
deleted by creator
x = arcsin(nk-1) + z(2*pi), such that z is any integer.