DickFiasco@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 months agoStinglemm.eeimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1266arrow-down111
arrow-up1255arrow-down1imageStinglemm.eeDickFiasco@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 months agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-squareboogetyboo@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 months agoI’ve never seen it. Was it any good?
minus-square_stranger_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoIt was very much a product of its time. It was alright.
minus-squareFeydaikin@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoIt’s good if you want something more ‘close to the books’ story wise. However, the Harkonnens are quite dialed back (they always are). And everything is low budget. But personally, I enjoyed it and still re-watch it from time to time.
minus-squareDickFiasco@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoIt’s enjoyable if you watch it in the context of it’s time. You can’t compare it to the Villeneuve version.
I’ve never seen it. Was it any good?
It was very much a product of its time. It was alright.
It’s good if you want something more ‘close to the books’ story wise.
However, the Harkonnens are quite dialed back (they always are). And everything is low budget.
But personally, I enjoyed it and still re-watch it from time to time.
It’s enjoyable if you watch it in the context of it’s time. You can’t compare it to the Villeneuve version.