RNAi [he/him]@hexbear.net to chat@hexbear.netEnglish · 8 days agoI'll throw fists at whoever defends the existence of fucking SPSS in my presencemessage-squaremessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up120arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up119arrow-down1message-squareI'll throw fists at whoever defends the existence of fucking SPSS in my presenceRNAi [he/him]@hexbear.net to chat@hexbear.netEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square9fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarecomrade_pibb [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-28 days agoPython is strongly typed. It’s also dynamically typed That’s different than weak typing
minus-squareSpeaker [e/em/eir]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-27 days agoThe qualifier “especially good” excludes Python. Static typing would be preferred, but not required.
minus-squarecomrade_pibb [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 days agoI really like kotlin
minus-squareSpeaker [e/em/eir]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 days agoI’m already writing Scala, Kotlin feels like it’d be a lateral or even negative move. 😄 I’d be curious to see what some nontrivial Spark in Kotlin looks like, though.
minus-squarecomrade_pibb [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 days agoYeah, I don’t think you’d have much to gain moving to kotlin
Python is strongly typed. It’s also dynamically typed
That’s different than weak typing
The qualifier “especially good” excludes Python. Static typing would be preferred, but not required.
I really like kotlin
I’m already writing Scala, Kotlin feels like it’d be a lateral or even negative move. 😄 I’d be curious to see what some nontrivial Spark in Kotlin looks like, though.
Yeah, I don’t think you’d have much to gain moving to kotlin