• Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    According to city violation data aggregated by the popular website How’s My Driving NY, Aquilino did receive two tickets on that same day in the West Village for blowing through a red light and speeding in a school zone.

    Supercars should be on racetracks, where they were designed for, instead of public roads. And Aquilino definitely should not be driving them on public roads.

    It’s pretty stupid that the law went after modifications, instead of just saying noise above x decibels is the issue.

  • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fun fact: any stock car that is this loud has something called an “exhaust valve” or a cutout. It’s an electronic device that adjusts the sound of the exhaust. Responsible super car owners only open this valve on the track, or in other appropriate places. I hope they repossess his little toy.

    • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      3 months ago

      It is no coincidence that the valves typically open in “sport” or “race” modes and in “street” mode the valves are closed.

      • icedterminal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t know if this is well known, but Lamborghini has a track record of loud exhaust, period. Regardless of valve state. Huracan Performante owners requested that Lamborghini make the next special edition a little quieter. Reason being the Performante was too loud even on race tracks. Track day drivers know there are noise limits that vary by track. You’re asked to leave immediately if you exceed the limit. You may also receive a temporary ban and/or fine.

        What did Lamborghini do? Make the Huracan STO even louder across all driving modes. The company demonstrates it believes noise limits themselves are annoying. While I do like loud cars myself, sometimes a noise compliant normal or comfort mode doesn’t exist.

        • Artyom@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Sound to me like Lamborghini isn’t interested in listening to the concerns of thr people and our only option is to punish the car owners until they stop getting bought. One is the logical consequence of the other.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It shouldn’t even be legal to operate an exhaust loud enough to require hearing protection.

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    “I feel that if the residents are upset by noise and the city wants to crack down on noise — I don’t disagree with it,” Aquilino said. “I disagree with if a car is unmodified and you want to fine them.”

    Massive ego on this sack of shit. “Residents are upset by noise but if the noise is stock then it is fine.”

    • Something Burger 🍔
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I understand where he is coming from. If the car is street legal, he shouldn’t have gotten a fine for using it. The problem is that cars that produce such levels of noise are street legal.

      • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lambos aren’t quiet, but if you drive them gently then they aren’t loud enough to set off the noise camera.

        So this is a bit like arguing someone should be allowed to blast their music at midnight just because the speakers were legal to buy and own. If a city implements noise restrictions to protect the health and well-being of their residents then people have a legal and moral obligation to do their best to comply even if that means driving your lambo slowly through residential areas.

        • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          They maybe don’t set them.off, but where i live, quite a lot of people drive Lamborghinis, and they are obnoxious loud, even if they just idle on a redlight. And just hitting the accelerator slightly more than usual and they are way louder than any peasant car is ever allowed to be.

      • exanime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Every single car you and I have ever owned, are presumably street legal, yet they can reach speeds that are illegal almost everywhere.

        Similarly, every knife I have ever owned has the necessary sharpness to cut meat… yet I am not supposed to cut human meat. I am pretty certain the car would not reach undesirable noise levels if he were not speeding or revving the engine, etc. So it is more on him for HOW he is using the car and not how the car was built

        So his reasoning sounds legit, but it really is not.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ok dumbass how do you adjust your exhaust? You can adjust your speed and sound of your stereo but you can’t adjust a stock exhaust. Nice false equivalence

          • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            He could just drive normally and his car would never reach the noise level for the ticket. Dude is intentionally driving to make noise. Similar to how bikes can Rev hard to be loud or just drive normally and be less loud.

            • jacksilver@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              3 months ago

              He states in the article he was slowing down when hitting the area the sound camera was in.

              Either way either make the cars illegal or deal. You can’t arbitrarily decide a car is illegal at a given moment in time. I get that people are annoyed with the sounds, but that’s one of the deals of living in a city. You know how many sirens go by in those area?

              • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                3 months ago

                Idk if I would believe a dude who got 2 more tickets that same day for speeding in a slow zone and running a red light.

          • exanime@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            well in the case of the car in the article… maybe don’t rev up every 10 meters like the length of your penis depends on it?

          • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Easy, you just drive slower and gently accelerate the car and then it will be far quieter.

            In a perfect world we could all be as loud as we wanted all the time and it wouldn’t hurt anyone, but people racing up and down residential streets wakes people up and there is data that shows traffic noises reduce your life expectancy… So I have to side with the sound restrictions here. Your freedom to be obnoxiously loud ends when it objectively negatively impacts public health.

      • USSMojave@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Just because it’s stock doesn’t mean the driver can’t rev the engine way too hard and loud like a crazy person, engine braking loud at shit down the street in the middle of the night, yeah could be annoying

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        Some others have mentioned there may be a distinction between levels of noise when the car is in some sort of “street” mode. I have zero sympathy if there is a street legal mode that he turned off while on public roads.

      • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        The car can do 200 miles per hour, and yet there are speed limits. Should he be exempt?

      • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Whats the noise level if the car is driving at a reasonable speed in the city?

        I imagine it’s only excessively noisy if they are showing off, revving the engine, and/or streeet racing

        • Schmuppes@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          That car cruising at 30 mph in the city is probably louder than a Honda Civic when you put the loud pedal all the way down on the freeway.

            • Schmuppes@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Yeah no shit. The thing is, those supercars are insanely loud from factory. I was behind a pair of Diablo SVs in a traffic jam on the motorway once, and even then they pretty much drowned out the sound of the little 500 cc motorcycle engine between my legs. I have no idea how those things are deemed street legal.

              Edit: It’s not about the revs alone, but also engine load. 3000 rpm stationary might be relatively quiet, but 3000 rpm with the throttle blades wide open is an entirely different matter.

      • irotsoma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Street legal doesn’t mean incapable of violating noise regulations if misused just like speed laws or any other traffic laws. Most gas engine cars can produce extreme amounts of noise just not when used as intended for driving on streets.

      • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is still a goofy line of reasoning. If you, for example, are driving a truck equipped with engine retarder brakes, in quite a lot of municipalities you literally aren’t allowed to use them because they are too loud for neighbourhoods. You risk getting a fine.

        Revving a lambo is exactly the same.

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      I fucking hate these things so much. I’m not as opposed to cars as many others in this sub, i need a car for work and i have a car that i sometimes drive on the weekends. Lamborghinis especially are such a thorn in my eyes, they look like ass, they are LOUD as shit, and not under load, they are just loud all the time. They are way to wide for normal streets and the most impractical things ever. And because they are only driven by cunts, they are extra loud. Peasant cars have to follow rules, but as soon as you have enough money: well, timmy needs a v12 racecar and they are very loud, that makes sense, right?

  • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    3 months ago

    I found it weird he complained about “how can anyone afford this?” referring to the tickets.

    First off, they’re supposed to be high to enforce the law and secondly how are you complaining about the cost while driving a $300k car around?

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ah yes, my car is stock so I should be able to disturb the whole neighbourhood with my car.

    I get it, sports cars are fun to drive, but they very much don’t need to be this loud.

  • jimmy90@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    oooh i wish i had one of these, wanker bikers like to rev their engines down our street

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    Can we please get these in Vancouver? So many loud losers that just need to make sure everyone can hear how cool they are

    • disgrunty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      We need them in most residential areas honestly. I live by a main road in my town and there’s so many people with these cars in the wee hours of the morning. I hate them.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    He’s not exactly wrong. On the face of it, it is a legal contradiction.

    NY says the car is legal to drive anywhere within the state.
    Then a local government sets a noise ordnance, making the car essentially illegal to drive in that part of the state.
    The conflicting laws need to get sorted out. No different than states not being able to make laws that go against federal law.

    If they take the same stance as State vs Federal, then the local ordnance being more restrictive than the states would supersede the state law. At the same time it could become unreasonable for individuals to research all the local ordinances they may encounter in a 20 mile trip.

    So yah. It’s easy to say “Asshole drives an expensive loud car and complains about the fine.”
    But there is more nuance and complications here that could go well beyond cars.

    • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      There is no contradiction. Just because the vehicle is licensed for street use doesn’t give the owner permission to operate it in ways that violates the law.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Or at all? Because he wasn’t doing anything unusual. He wasn’t racing, or speeding even. Just driving normally.

        • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Nothing unusual? On the same day he got the noise ticket, he received tickets for running a red light and speeding in a school zone.

          • Steve@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            If that was at the same time and place as the noise system was triggered, that might matter.

        • Hawke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You sure about that?

          According to city violation data aggregated by the popular website How’s My Driving NY, Aquilino did receive two tickets on that same day in the West Village for blowing through a red light and speeding in a school zone.

          He says he was just driving normally but I get the feeling he may be at the very least stretching the truth.

          • Steve@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Possibly. But we don’t know if that was the case at the location of the noise monitoring.

    • Roggebrood@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      You could argue the same about emission zones which are common across Europe (mainly in inner cities). Just because your vehicle is allowed on the road, it doesn’t you can drive it anywhere.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Agreed. But again its a question of scale. Its reasonable for one larger city. But what about 20 small towns?

    • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      At the same time it could become unreasonable for individuals to research all the local ordinances they may encounter in a 20 mile trip.

      It is extremely reasonable. Drivers are always responsible to learn the laws of places they drive. Are you only required to follow the law of your plate’s state/province? Is turning right on red in NYC okay if you are plated outside the city?

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Either the car is street legal or not, we don’t need to give cops even more power to pull people over and/or ticket them. This is an unreasonable burden for a person.

      • Something Burger 🍔
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not it is not. Driver’s licenses are valid in the entire country, the rules of the road should be the same everywhere.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        NY requires each intersections that aren’t Right on Red to be posted at the light. So you know on a turn by turn basis if you’re allowed or not. A noise ordinance isn’t.

        In larger areas sure. Knowing those things is reasonable. But if you’re crossing 15 different little municipalities is it reasonable to expect people to look up all the local laws for each of them?

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Aren’t there noise ordinances in every city? Do you look up the specific decibel levels for every city you drive through?

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not all. And not just cities. But small towns, villages, even HOAs. You’d have to check them all.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          No, I mean they already exist. And nobody is looking them up, because who cares? It turns out if you drive vehicles that make reasonable amounts of noise it isn’t a problem.

    • rbn@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m with you. But the consequence to sort out the contradiction might be also a state-wide ban if certain boundaries are exceeded.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That could be the case, making the car no longer street legal to buy and register in NY. That’s a reasonable solution.