TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldimagemessage-square90linkfedilinkarrow-up1419arrow-down124
arrow-up1395arrow-down1imageSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldTheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square90linkfedilink
minus-squareMiaoulinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoWith such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
minus-squareEthan@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agoSo you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?
With such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
So you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?