@TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 25 days agoSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1413arrow-down124
arrow-up1389arrow-down1imageSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.world@TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 25 days agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-square@Miaoulink5•24 days agoWith such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
minus-squareEthanlinkfedilinkEnglish0•23 days agoSo you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?
With such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
So you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?