TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 6 months agoSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldimagemessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1417arrow-down124
arrow-up1393arrow-down1imageSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldTheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 6 months agomessage-square90fedilink
minus-squareMiaoulinkfedilinkarrow-up5·6 months agoWith such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
minus-squareEthan@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·6 months agoSo you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?
With such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
So you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?