• Syl ⏚
    link
    1611 months ago

    Only quad9? Why not google or cloudflare, the bigger dns servers?

      • @P1r4nha@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        1711 months ago

        Yup, they are trying to establish easy precedence. Quad9 has not enough funds to battle the suit, even tough they are probably the least guilty party.

        Targeting DNS services is an interesting strategy, but if you know how the technology works it’s also a silly one. Attacking those who only translate your request to access a site hosting copy righted content instead of the operator or host… or users for that matter.

        • Syl ⏚
          link
          11
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          If you know how to configure your dns to point to quad9, you can easily change to another one. Shame Sony.

        • @ISOmorph@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          but if you know how the technology works

          That’s like what, 2% of online users globally? Let’s say pirates are marginally more tech savvy, so maybe 10% of pirates? If their plan works and they can get google to block access to all sorts of streaming and torrenting sites, that will massively reduce the numbers of people accessing illegal content.

          • Monkey With A Shell
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            https://www.lumendatabase.org/

            Targeting DNS and killing traffic to an entire site is easier than the constant drumbeat of sending out takedowns for specific links to everyone. Way over the top, and of course they wouldn’t try it against a big opponent. Would love to see them make a case that YouTube should be globally DNS blocked, after all look at all the infringing videos and music that’s on there daily.