• @squirmy_wormy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -96 months ago

    No it isn’t. That is corporatocracy. Imperialism is a policy of extending a country’s power and influence through diplomacy or military force.

    • @DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Let me get this right.

      You don’t think the British East Indian Company’s conquest of India was imperialism either?

      Because it wasn’t technically the state doing it.

        • @DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          66 months ago

          You know what, I deserve this conversation. I’ve trolled people with “It can’t be imperialism because we’re a republic” before, this is just karma.

          On the off chance that you’re not just trolling, no, it isn’t, because your definition sucks and is deliberately limited so you can be a pedantic yet incorrect twat about some of history’s greatest crimes.

          • @squirmy_wormy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -36 months ago

            No I’m not being a troll. And it’s not my definition, it’s the actual meaning of the word. Words - especially when used in emotionally charged contexts - have meaning and when they are misused to make a nice little sound bite, it dilutes the power they have. I don’t like when people do that.

    • @Miaou
      link
      English
      -26 months ago

      So exactly what was described?