@ElCanut to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 8 months agoOh no ...imagemessage-square339arrow-up11.81Karrow-down1110
arrow-up11.7Karrow-down1imageOh no ...@ElCanut to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 8 months agomessage-square339
minus-squareBaut [she/her] auf.linkfedilink1•8 months agoX’ architecture is insecure. There’s no isolation between windows, and each process can spy on your input. That’s just one example. Wayland is necessary.
minus-square@ExLisper@linux.communitylinkfedilinkEnglish3•8 months agoYet no known active exploits use this insecure architecture to cause actual harm. It’s just another FUD.
minus-squareBaut [she/her] auf.linkfedilink1•8 months agoI’d hardly call that an exploit. There’s no protection.
X’ architecture is insecure. There’s no isolation between windows, and each process can spy on your input. That’s just one example.
Wayland is necessary.
Yet no known active exploits use this insecure architecture to cause actual harm. It’s just another FUD.
I’d hardly call that an exploit. There’s no protection.