@meiko60@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish • 9 months agoTested: Windows 11 Pro's On-By-Default Encryption Slows SSDs Up to 45%www.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1258arrow-down112 cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinehardware@lemmy.mlhackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1246arrow-down1external-linkTested: Windows 11 Pro's On-By-Default Encryption Slows SSDs Up to 45%www.tomshardware.com@meiko60@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish • 9 months agomessage-square42fedilink cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinehardware@lemmy.mlhackernews@derp.foo
minus-square@AProfessional@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish11•9 months agoNo, it’s limited by CPU time. The drive neither knows or cares about encryption.
minus-square@SheeEttin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-29 months agoSome drives do, but it doesn’t affect lifespan either way. Writing 10GB of encrypted data is the same as 10GB unencrypted.
minus-squareTWeaKlinkfedilinkEnglish2•9 months agoYeah, I was thinking maybe the data would be written out of order or something, but that wouldn’t be the case. The data will be garbled by the encryption, but still written sequentially, or however the internal drive controller decides is best.
No, it’s limited by CPU time. The drive neither knows or cares about encryption.
Some drives do, but it doesn’t affect lifespan either way. Writing 10GB of encrypted data is the same as 10GB unencrypted.
Yeah, I was thinking maybe the data would be written out of order or something, but that wouldn’t be the case. The data will be garbled by the encryption, but still written sequentially, or however the internal drive controller decides is best.