• Candelestine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can anonymize anything, you just strip the identifying data out and do not include it when you give the info out. Like scrubbing the metadata off a pic before you post it online.

      The level of discourse in this sub has really fallen off a cliff recently…

      • LaSaucisseMasquee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can’t anonymize genetic data because, by essence, it identifies an individual.

        • ares35@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          and, given enough samples, even those NOT in the database, are anyway by genetic relation.

        • Candelestine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          By that logic you cannot anonymize a pic either. Yet everyone who has their photo taken cannot necessarily be identified in it.

          • LaSaucisseMasquee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Can’t show a proof without doxxing me but I’ve written a patent to anonymize medical data (not genetic) and I’m a bioinformatician working with sequencing data.

            While you could probably achieve reasonable privacy levels by altering genetic data, we shouldn’t play with that under fallacious pretenses.

            You can use that data for medical research, of course… but also population profiling or stratification of customers if you are an insurance company.

          • Bipta@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Anonymized data has long been problematic and you definitely cannot meaningfully anonymize a picture in the truest sense of the word.

      • gibmiser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, paternity tests exist. Genetics, once enough data are collected, can absolutely be used to identify people.

        • Candelestine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Correct. Much like with a fingerprint, with both examples, you can determine with good accuracy if they are the same.

          In addition, as tools are advancing, we can extrapolate with very large data sets to identify you even without having seen your specific code, by tracing commonalities through any relatives of yours that voluntarily or involuntarily submitted their codes. However, this does still require those codes to be identifiable. A randomized set of random people’s codes could not be used for this, anymore than a database of fingerprints where all the labels were deleted could be used. It’s just a bunch of random fingerprints, with no names attached anywhere at all, its just a bunch of bleh.

          So, big concern in the hands of anyone who has not scrubbed the labels all off, which would overall render it much less useful.