If we accept that employees spend the same amount of time as without AI but now the error rate is reduced then yes. I don’t think that is the case but I don’t have the numbers so who knows.

I agree, but the article is about the Finnish government, unless there is something I don’t know they weren’t making any profit to begin with.

I’m making up numbers because I don’t have the actual numbers and 2x is easy for the example, insert whatever numbers you like.

The issue with that statement is that putting double the employees on a project doesn’t always improve its quality.

If we go with the numbers we have been going with and a employee with AI is twice as productive then adding AI effectively doubles the time available. This only leads to a quality increase if work was being cut short. If each employee already got the required time necessary to handle a application with full quality then you haven’t increased quality but the capacity. If the now increased capacity is far above normal volume it is a waste to have so much excess capacity.

No? Where have I excluded that option? If for normal volumes 100 employees are need to process. And with AI only 50 are needed, then it’s still cost saving?

Why are those mutually exclusive?

If a human clerk handling applications or something makes an error 1 in a 100 applications and an AI system has the same error rate but is far cheaper. Then quality stays the same.

That’s why I emphasized if, there are plenty ways to get lower quality with human employees aswell.

I don’t really understand the last paragraph, its a government so they don’t have a profit margin?

“We are not against the deployment of new technologies in a sensible manner, but we would oppose the use of AI if the primary motivation is to secure savings only,” said Simola. “Whatever the government decides on AI in the public sector transformation, the final implementation plan should not overlook what impact the changes will have on employees and on how public services are both managed and delivered to ensure quality and higher productivity.”

If AI can do the same job with equal quality, why would it be bad if the primary motivation is to secure savings only?

I’m not Finnish but as a citizen i would rather have my tax money spent on stuff that can’t be automated then on stuff that can.

They are scared of chinese open source AI

Thank you!

yeah firmware extraction is a bit finicky at the moment sadly. I am considering removing the hash check, i placed it there to prevent it from using incorrect firmware but if it blocks working firmware then it probably needs to go.

If you want please add me on matrix @the_mighty_cat:catcrafts.net so we can debug the calls.

This might sound stupid but git?

Thank you!

I don’t want to talk down my own achievements but alot of the thanks also goes to Luca Weiss!

(i don’t know his fedi or if he even has one otherwise i would tag him)

I like the psionics (or well Psycasts) in rimworld and it has a prominent enough role.

Mind tech that calls some machine superintelligence to alter reality, bestowed by space feudalism.

Live in dorms. Cafeteria food. Minimum wage

I got that from this statement, my mistake then.

I’ve not met a single person who disagrees with this system.

Well consider me the first.

Then first the plan won’t work, those dorms will be run by the very government politicians they are supposed to make miserable. so they won’t.

And why must that be a goal in the first place? Instead of improving democracy so that politicians aren’t in the pockets of PACs and actually represent the people, you want to just make them both miserable and now unelected.

If you want that random people are in charge instead of politicians a direct democracy system will work far better then this.

Don’t forget Israel

I see, but sadly not the same then still using the qualcomm bootloader, but that bootloads U-boot then.

If we could fully replace the qualcomm bootloader we won’t get that annoying “the bootloader is unlocked” message on startup.

Yes!

its in /dev/input/event2 emitting SW_MUTE_DEVICE events.

I count 26 cats in that picture.

26 is a huge amount of cats to begin with.

26 cats in a trailer house however is animal abuse.

👀

I have been summoned.

If the question is about apps then yes postmarketos can run any linux executable compiled for arm. When you run it with a DE like plasma mobile you can run any normal wayland program like on desktop, but keep in mind the program must be display responsive otherwise it will be very hard to work with.

I don’t know about a lemmy app but yes there are mail, browsers and YouTube apps that also scale properly to the mobile form factor.

Personally I wouldn’t recommend waydroid unless you absolutely need it, for most things there is a native linux app.