No, maybe that wasn’t it. Words precede and surpass me, they tempt and alter me, and if I am not careful it will be too late: things will be said without my having said them. Or, at the very least, that wasn’t the only thing. My entanglement comes from how a carpet is made of so many threads that I can’t resign myself to following just one; my ensnarement comes from how one story is made of many stories. And I can’t even tell them all— a more truthful word could from echo to echo cause my highest glaciers to crumble down the precipice.” - Clarice Lispector

  • 5.04K Posts
  • 8.61K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 9th, 2023

help-circle

  • Based on my experience with how people respond to things I post I am not convinced at all this strategy even increases engagement.

    Maybe you can show a number for a slightly higher click through rate, I don’t know and it doesn’t really matter since people so obviously tend to bounce off articles that fish for clicks in a condescending manipulative way that whatever the benefit is (if it exists which I am doubtful), it doesn’t remotely even make up for the greater number of people who just pass the article by because they felt they were being prodded by an emotionally manipulating headline.

    To put it another way, I often change an overly clickbait article title if I share the article because I want people to actually read it.

    I would rather 1 person genuinely read an article I post than 10 people vaguely interact with it, click through to read a sentence or two and then close out of it. The latter experience is a waste for everyone involved but the people selling ads between the articles.

    Honestly I think the same holds for media entities like The Verge they just have convinced themselves with bean counting the wrong things that they are optimizing instead of undermining.