I had to scroll to the comments to remember her names was Yunyun 🤣

Except that “fake” voting patterns become impossible to spot.

The way they are now, you can look at how an account votes, when it was created, as well as their posts and comments, to determine whether an account is a legitimate user.

Creating fake accounts that look like legit users is a lot of work. Creating just one, then setting a number a really high, is much, much easier.

Or don’t.

This is going to be new trend, isn’t it.

Oh that series you like? Last episode, only in theathers. Pay up.

Where does cringe go?

Paraphrasing happens all the time for titles to compress what someone has said. But often it’s done to confuse rather than inform.

If you want to stick with a true quote “we got the design right” fits. You could then alter the following title to further clarify:

‘we got the design right’: Resident Evil Requiem Dev Pleased Fans Prefer Original Design Over DLSS 5 Grace

‘They Prefer our Original Design’: Resident Evil Requiem Dev Is Pleased by Heated Reaction to DLSS 5 Grace

Edit: Or even better:

‘We Got it Right the First Time’: Resident Evil Requiem Dev Is Pleased by Heated Reaction to DLSS 5 Grace

Either way, the issue is the paraphrased quote. “it was a positive” is literally just the same as the title that follows it. It adds no context.

The “intent” of the title is to leave out context, to let readers jump to more clickbaity conclusions.

You yourself are saying “I got it right based on this additional detail I already knew”.

It removes enough context to enable other interpretations. Such as “all publicity is good publicity, who cares that they didn’t like it”.

It basically allows people to get it wrong, while technically still matching the original intent. This way, at least some people will jump to conclusions that are more clickbaity.

You got it right. But I, and clearly a lot of others, raised our eyebrows.

the fact a lot of players commented they really liked the original design of Grace and didn’t want to see it changed was a positive…

Title taking things out if context, is out of context.

Agatha Christie is an author, so probably not the title.

What’s with the point zero?

Will we see fractionals? CnH 4.6.4?

Then they shouldn’t call it that.

The word has a definition, and quack science explanation that defines the “field”.

“Chiropractors” who provide proper care aren’t exactly being honest, either. They don’t call themselves that because it’s simpler. They do it because it’s illegal for them to claim to be medical professionals.

Incredible goob density in the tiniest known package.

That sound exactly the same, actually.

How are they regulated? Because if they aren’t, then you don’t really know what you’re getting.

“Good” chiropractors will stick to the same treatments that actual medical professionals would prescribe, and hence produce results at times. But that doesn’t change the fact that it’s not a protected term that brings with it some kind of license or education.

As such, no-one who takes doing things right seriously goes by it. To people who science, the term sits right next to homeopathy, and will never be associated with serious medical care.

Perish at the hands of Pikasaur!

1. On android, the setting is in Settings>Security>More Security

2. Yes

3. The fact that it can only be attempted three times, after which a much longer PUK code you from your service provider must be used to restore funtionality to the SIM. It also has limited attempts, after which the SIM is locked forever.

Not sure how that works cryptographically, or how robust a physical SIM is against tampering.

I’ve always used a PIN.

I did not know eSIM is stored outside the normal data partition and survuves factory resets. That doesn’t feel right.

Edit: huh, my eSIM had a default pin set which I had to provide to set one.

The setting is in Security, not SIM card info.

Also 20, 30, and 40 year olds. Above that, they have also hve other reasons.

We must support and boost that confidence