

Ahh yeah true, good point.


Ahh yeah true, good point.


“Offensive” conduct must be more than merely hurtful, annoying or vexing. It must be “calculated or likely to arouse significant anger, significant resentment, outrage, disgust, or hatred in the mind of a reasonable person in all the circumstances.” Moreover, it must “be likely to have a serious effect upon the emotional well-being of an addressee.”
I dunno if that’s entirely true but maybe I’m misunderstanding this - it seems kinda open to interpretation.


I think also, people forget that open source projects need maintainers who are properly invested.
It’s difficult to imagine a meaningful future for a codebase that you spun up with AI and don’t actually understand yourself.
There’s an expectation of stewardship beyond “yeah I spent 2k on tokens”


Alternatively, many of these exploits are dependent on extremely niche situations that are mostly handled by existing safeguards.
I’d be interested to see the actual real world severity of these - are they actually things that could be used in an exploit in any meaningful way?
RCE is substantially more severe, it’s possible there just aren’t as many, as they aren’t as applicable to highly contrived scenarios


What if we just learned to code and wrote if ourselves and took some personal interest in the lines we produce?


Almost by definition, maintainability doesn’t refer to a “specific part”
https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/blog/artcraft-adobe-clone-ai-code-quality/
I’m not interested in getting into an argument about this any further, look through their github issues, there’s plenty to learn.
As a note, if you think they’re genuinely reviewing this much code at this speed, I think you need to consider the logistics of that.


Also unsustainable: the code they generate.
It’s huge, sprawling and messy.
https://github.com/storytold/photocraft/issues/6903
https://github.com/storytold/artcraft/issues/2273
https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/blog/artcraft-adobe-clone-ai-code-quality/
Exactly. Lots of good stuff written in Rust!
Yeah that should be fine, some recipes use malt syrup instead.
Any kind of sugar syrup that can feed the yeast would be viable.


This is almost entirely AI generated by the looks of it.
The code, the readme, the website.
https://russellathletic.com.au/
No, it’s a joke about this brand.