

Oh no, the pedophilic con man called me the enemy…


Oh no, the pedophilic con man called me the enemy…


I agree, we should ban corporate social media for everyone!


I’m not going to argue about the semantics of anonymity on the internet
You just did. Those things are not anonymous. And are subject to EAs lawsuits and likely to be taken down elsewhere just like they are on GitHub.
Thanks for the invitation, I might take you up on that!


Having driven electric vehicles in 10 Texas Winters, and also paying attention to some basic science, I can assure you it absolutely is.
Also my diesel which normally gets 50mpg drops to 20-25 when towing.
No one cares when there’s 3 fueling stations per mile and it only takes 5 minutes to refuel.
Maybe don’t eat the slop the talking heads are paid to shovel into the trough.
Maybe stop fucking lying 🤷


I made up some shit you didn’t say and put it in quotes in a sad attempt to completely misrepresent and delegitimize what you said
Eat a dick 🖕


By having an entity in the first place to force to comply.
A lot of them aren’t actually that active I found.
How is creating more new ones going to solve that problem?
I found myself posting the same news to a few of them simultaneously which was also using up a lot of time
I ask again, how is this solving that problem?
In my case, many were too specific
There are at least 3 general Linux communities.
There’s no real benefit to less communities I feel either
I just explained the benefits in the comment you replied to.
We could argue that pretty much every community on Lemmy has duplicates. So why bother making any?
Sometimes there are good reasons. Often times there aren’t. The explanation that some communities are too specific doesn’t really check out, because several are not. What else ya got?


…yes? I understood that.
Because we already have several general communities and creating more of them just creates fragmentation.


You mean articles talking about how supposed misconceptions are wrong? How about find one that says it in the affirmative?


I mean if you wanted to give a charitable interpretation it could be simply that there would be swift retribution and they would regret it. Like “oh I wish you would punch me” or something. So, yeah, let him clarify, but he simply won’t, because that’s not what he meant.
Honestly Trump has a lot in common with The Bible in that he and God both speak a bunch of fucking word salad gibberish and we’re all left alone to try to interpret WTF he just said because he refuses to clarify.


You should probably think a little more. Public code repos are not anonymous. And torrents require some form of advertising to even know they exist.


Who pays a lawsuit against the FCC? What positive action could possibly come from that?


How are they going to distribute something while being anonymous?


He was clearly stating U.S. cities would have been threatened if a nuclear Iran hadn’t been stopped.
He clearly was not. But by all means, invite him to clarify. Stop speaking for him.
Adminforge also runs a free public ntfy server: https://ntfy.adminforge.de/


I mean it would make way more sense to use one of the many messengers that explicitly use TOR like Cwtch or Briar.
You’re correct, I’m not.