Requires an account to even look at the Mermaid source of a diagram. :/

Participating countries and territories: Angola, Argentina, Austria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana Brazil, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Colombia, Democratic Rep of Congo, Eritrea, Eswatini, France, Gambia, Georgia, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Guyana, Honduras, Iceland, India, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liechtenstein, Macao (China), Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Moldova, Mongolia, Niger, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Paraguay, Philippines, Poland, Qatar, Singapore, South Africa, South Sudan, Spain, Sri Lanka, Switzerland, Tanzania, Togo, Türkiye, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, Venezuela, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

Impressive list of countries participating

Update - 13/03/2026 11:10 UTC - The Lutris creator has restored the Claude attribution, with a comment noting “Since it’s such a big fuss, I’m putting the Claude attribution back”.

I obviously don’t know your environment, but I don’t think a manager needs access or knowledge to git to effectively manage teams, hear and understand team member concerns, and to steer guidelines and guardrails.

Seems similar to Jupyter/Polyglot Notebooks, but focused on APIs.

For context, I looked Bruno up

Bruno is a Git-friendly and offline-first open-source API client aimed at revolutionizing the status quo represented by tools like Postman and Insomnia.

Voiden lists Bruno on their comparison page as well

if I could stay later when there’s broken things in prod

In general, or on this instance?

Do you have team retrospectives? That’s where I would bring it up in my team. Raise my concerns, explore and understand what team consensus is around this topic, around risks, quality, etc.

If the team consensus and/or management consensus is YOLO - then I try to protect myself from personal investment and going beyond contractual obligations. Because I already know what will come and how it will negatively affect me personally.

It’s possible a honest discussion with management about goals and risks could lead to clarified guidelines, requirements, and goals. If it doesn’t, I’d probably be looking for a better job/environment. Because I’ll be miserable if colleagues YOLO, no matter how careful I am personally.

That sounds so much more useful than their website self description.

Some people are more receptive to these kinds of things than others. Not only in terms of open mind but also how they are able to apply it (or capable of applying it?).

I wish agreeing on intentions and improvements in terms of scoping and description would be met. Same with unnecessary, obvious issues showing up costing review time and iterations. I just don’t get how these are issues - but they are - for or with some people.

I never thought I would move away from FOSS/AGPL by default. The more I read about this issue, the more I consider providing free services instead of FOSSing. It’s a shame.

FOSS is still important and necessary to a degree, for auditability and self-hostability, very important for security and control, even as a conscious/careful user.

Maybe this puts us more towards “pay to free the code” or something, so there is at least some compensation. Won’t make verbatim regenerated AGPL to MIT any less hurtful though.

If you publish a free service, at least they’re not feeding from your code too.

Tragic.

I find “from scratch” a questionable claim as well. The model was probably trained on the code it is supposed to replace. Interfacing with the concrete tests and interfaces makes the result even more likely to be and puts it conceptually closer to the original code fed as training data.

What is TrueNAS?

TrueNAS is a high performance data platform for managing any type of data, delivered through turnkey self-healing storage appliances and expert around-the-clock support.

Classic phishing. Secure channels are only as good as the gate and key handling surrounding them.

For official org-based accounts like that, I could imagine a messaging system where you can only see and share security codes with a second-person factor. If the user wants to access it, at least another authorized trained person must take part, acknowledge, and authorize the action. As long as users can access key information relatively easily, they are phishable.

AI-generated art not being copyrightable doesn’t necessarily mean AI-generated art can’t violate original copyright, though.

This is not about AI-generated code being relicensed to different AI-generated code. It’s about the original licensed code being relicensed or otherwise violated through AI-generated code.

, so it’s in the public domain and they’re free to do with it whatever they want, and they would legally be right.

What do you base this “all AI code is public domain by legal definition” on?

Being asked to gesture words I don’t know, or Nierenfunktionsstörung and other long German words like that 😅☠️

The need to manually download and load a lib and then send the results manually via email is somewhat of a hassle, unfortunately.

I do hate that all these features are yet more keywords and weird syntax. It’s becoming C##.

It’s called sharp because you can cut yourself. /s

Like them.

They have their downsides, so they’re no more than an alternative to other approaches. They can condense code and concerns in some cases. The more complex the type is, the less obvious the primary constructor parameters become.

Is it bent like that because you can bend stuff in the app?