Only the frontend is open source. A model similar to telegram.

Affordability is essential to societal stability. Some cabal against the city government is pressuring the brewers, or the taverns, or the brewers guild, to increase beer prices. This can be made through taxes, fees, extortion… The extra money is siphoned to other actions to destabilise the city or to build a army. This can be done by kidnapping relatives to innocent people, corrupting government/guild officials, mind control…

The real motivation can be a noble dispute, a revolutionary uprising, a foreign plot to facilitate a conquest…

Had to nuke the profile on my instance. The modlog tells the crocodile is toning down their true opinions to appear less egregious.

OP shared a thought. I pointed this is a formal concept and pointed the name, so they can search for more. The concept describes a real and observable phenomena.

Why are you bringing moral judgement of people here? Even if poor people are guilt of their own poverty (they aren’t) like you are implying, it doesn’t change they are formally, but not really free. Marx description stills holds up.

Austrália

A nation built on stolen land where the better predictor of your class is is you are descendants from the settlers or from tha natives.

Nothing is stopping…

Except the inequal distribution of aducational and work opportunities, that assure the intergenerational inequality reproduction.

a concerned note:

Your comment about some people having fought for rights and others not is borderline racist. With precious comments about Darwin, it’s a red flag.

All people fight. Some fights are smashed with unimaginable violence. We are watching a live genocide in Gaza to prove this point. Oceania colonization is built upon a genocide. I’m not assuming you have conscience of how disturbing these comments are for a person like me, in South America, where all attempts to built a decent society where meet with USA interventions. Try to think in more broad terms, not only based on your experience, but trying to encompass the multiple experiences in the world.

Yeah. Marx called it formal vs. real freedom. All the people are free to sleep under the bridges or at a five star penthouse. But some are forced to sleep under the bridge and only a few have means to exercise the freedom to enter the penthouse.

Thanks. This is a great work for non-English fediverse enthusiasts.

The last one is Lord of the Lost. Scratched the itch of getting a metal band that I don’t have to worry about being a nazi cult in the future.

Do you have the link of the source? Thanks.

Collabora office is a thing.

From your own source.

China’s cumulative per capita emissions of 227 tons of CO₂ are significantly lower than those of the EU (682 tons) and the USA (1,570 tons)

This. And also for Israel. And France.

I would never drink a milk that lasts two weeks. Real food spoils. This must be some liquid plastic.

One liter (0.26 gl) bottles or boxes.

No.

To have a decentralised network, you need a lot of servers storing some data and a access algorithm thar searches for the pieces. There are a lot of hard problems:

• you need various copies because each node can go offline any moment. This works for pirated DVDs, but not for social media posts.
• you need to store a lot of the network in each node. The user needs to contribute to the network. Few people will donate GBs of storage and bandwidth to use a social network. You will get only a few enthusiasts.
• search is a nightmare nobody have really solved.

The architecture is good for storing and distributing many copies of a few very popular contents (and shines in torrent) but is bad for storing, searching for, and accessing many unpopular and mildly popular contents.

And to hide the collapsing demand that fuelled their bad quarter numbers (higher stockpile and time to get paid for sales).

Para esse tamanho de terreno, talvez você deva pesquisar pelo “sisteminha”.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=f2wcxiqk2To

First, there is no such thing as an accurate translation. As Walter Benjamin said, translation is treason.

Second, there is no consensus about what is the Bible. What are the books to be included, and what is the earlier version of these books. When you start to look close, you have entirely made up books, like leviticus, a lot of editing and changing before Christianity, apocryphal books, and so on.

Third, this would be an enormous task needing a ton of funding and a very long time. I doubt we will have something like this anytime.

This crow I can support.

What is relevant: “for its own commercial purposes. In that regard, the general terms and conditions of use of that marketplace give Russmedia considerable freedom to exploit the information published on that marketplace.”

This turns the marketplace in a business that must have responsibilities and duty to care because they not only host the content, but process it.

Hosting is defined on paragraph 6. It does not involve processing of information. You user hit publish, it is published without any processing and and you don’t claim right to “use published content, distribute it, transmit it, reproduce it, modify it, translate it, transfer it to partners and remove it at any time, without the need for any ‘valid’ reason for so doing.”.

The GDPR don’t claim you are responsible for merely hosting personal information, but you become responsible by processing it. “The processing of personal data should be designed to serve mankind.”

The point is: you can run a lemmy instance, have people publishing shitposts all day in a hands off moderation policy. One day someone posts a doxxing. As soon you are told, you delete and it’s OK. But you can’t run a business where you invite people to post doxxing information, you claim rights to distribute this information, and them say you are only hosting it, and not processing it.

The problem is the site want the cake (free harbour immunity) and eat it (gain rights to profit from the published content).