I love genuine questions and people putting in the effort to love and understand each other better. If you come at me just wanting to argue I’m going to troll you back. FAFO.

  • 130 Posts
  • 216 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle
  • Apytele@sh.itjust.workstoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world102%
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    26 minutes ago

    Honestly I wonder if some of it isn’t people in super remote areas or otherwise disconnected from conventional communities. If you live on a mountain with no internet or TV and drive into town once a month for groceries or live in an underground mole people tunnel system it’s probably easier to not give a fuck. Like obviously these things will still affect you, but not in any immediate way that’s gonna slap you in the face tomorrow.

    If somebody catches that guy at the grocery store at the end of the month and gets him to fill out a survey he’s probably just like “…who? Oh a coupon though!” And the mole person will do it for a $5 subway card. That’s still at least a cookie these days. And they’ll both just check “meh” for everything and hand the survey back and take their coupon. I talked to a dude at the bus stop for a while that said getting his phone stolen had actually turned out to be really great for his mental health aside from needing to ask me when the next one was coming. Like I get that this is important stuff but sometimes ignorance looks pretty damn blissful.




  • Used to work with the criminally insane. I’ve also met a LOT of pedophiles. Not many because they actually were crazy but because they were trying to get declared as such to not get fucked up in prison. Most of them aren’t even actually attracted to children they just wanna victimize someone and children are smaller / weaker and less able to advocate for themselves. The one thing pretty much all of them have in common is a pitiful combination of sadism and cowardice.


  • Apytele@sh.itjust.worksto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneHorse electro-rules
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    And also interestingly, most mammals have the same electrolyte needs as humans. Some need more or less water (esp desert animals), but the balance of the electrolytes themselves (sodium vs potassium vs magnesium etc) are a lot more similar than you would think. The safe water ratio for oral intake is pretty wide too because the 90% of the kidneys job is to rebalance that, so as long as the electrolytes are balanced in relation to each other you’re fine. So for Gatorade the optimal electrolyte level is actually about half (I usually dilute it 1:1 with water) but most healthy humans can easily tolerate it as-is (but it’s still only better than water if you’re losing a lot of water to illness or exercise).

    When I looked up the normal range for the metabolic panel of a dog, the electrolytes were almost identical to a humans. I remember there being a theory that it relates strongly to when in the evolutionary chain we left the oceans, which is pretty similar for most mammals. Assuming this is true of horses, I wouldn’t think this would be any more harmful than Gatorade or pedialyte, and even beneficial in some cases (significant fluid loss to illness or exercise).








  • I think you need a line break after the second spoiler and I think you are missing a space after the :::

    Wait lemme check:

    spoiler

    Yes

    spoiler no :::

    this doesn’t load in boost but does load in the web version?

    Yeah it’s not just my app the first one renders right. Although weirdly enough now that I open this on web it renders ok but only the first one renders as a proper spoiler in boost. Weird.






  • Honestly the research on exactly why this happens is sparse enough as it is. It’s basically impossible to do truly conclusive studies with tobacco because of how dangerous it is. We can’t even technically conclusively say that tobacco causes cancer because to truly scientifically assert that you’d have to do a randomized controlled trial.

    To have a truly randomized controlled trial you would have to randomly select people from the overall sample and tell them to start smoking for the purposes of the study (otherwise you can’t technically rule out there being some third thing that both causes the cancer and causes people to want to smoke). And because we know tobacco is insanely addictive and are all but that one millimeter short of proving that it causes cancer, no medical ethics oversight body would ever allow a study that requires participants to start smoking.