Lots of Americans say they are prepared to vote against President Joe Biden in November. Among the many reasons seems to be a persistent belief that Biden has accomplished “not very much” or “little or nothing” (according to an ABC-Washington Post poll from the summer), or that his policies have actually hurt people (according to a Wall Street Journal poll from last month).
…
I suspect most Americans do grasp that Biden supports and wants to strengthen “Obamacare,” while his likely opponent ― i.e., Trump, currently the GOP front-runner ― still wants to get rid of it. But most Americans seem unaware that Biden and the Democrats have also been working to make insulin cheaper, through a pair of changes that are already taking effect.
The first of these arrived as part of the Inflation Reduction Act, the sweeping 2022 climate and health care legislation that included several initiatives to reduce the price of prescription drugs. Among them was a provision guaranteeing that Medicare beneficiaries ― that is, seniors and people with disabilities ― could get insulin for just $35 a month.
The provision took effect a year ago and, at the time, the administration estimated that something like 1.5 million seniors stood to save money from it. Indeed, there’s already evidence that fewer seniors are rationing their own insulin in order to save money. But as of August, polling from the health research organization KFF found that just 24% of Americans knew the $35 cap existed.
…
As of Jan. 1, the three companies that dominate the market (Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi) have all lowered prices and made some of their products available to non-elderly, non-disabled Americans for the same $35 a month that Medicare beneficiaries now pay. The companies announced these changes last year, presenting them as a voluntary action to show they want to make sure customers can get lifesaving drugs.
But by nearly all accounts, it was primarily a reaction to an obscure policy change in Medicaid, the joint federal-state program for low-income people. The effect of the tweak was to penalize drug companies financially if they had been raising commercial prices too quickly.
It’s not JUST insulin though. Diabetes runs in my family, so I grew up experiencing all the highs and lows. (HA! BEETUS JOKE!)
EVERYTHING about managing it is expensive. The needles are expensive, the test strips are STUPID expensive, as are the meters and CGM systems.
Imagine this… you’re a type 1 and have to test multiple times a day.
$38 for 90 strips. Now that doesn’t sound AWFUL, does it? Except a type 1 is supposed to test at least 4 times a day… Suddenly those 90 strips aren’t even a full months supply. I’ve seen folks test 6 times a day, now that 90 strips lasts 15 days.
And $38 for 90 is CHEAP. They can easily run $1 a strip.
This is a great step forward. You can’t change the majority of pharmaceutical companies overnight, but it’s fantastic that it is finally changing.
Regulation. For all the people that are going to argue that regulation is bad, regulation means forestalling the inevitable profit driven greed of corporate pharmacy.
not really
eventually babies grow up and adult steps should be taken
US policy on everything is either do nothing or take small baby steps
Roe vs Wade was a baby step that was supposed to be codified but baby steps we were told are enough
This is why I don’t use the term “baby steps”. It is an inaccurate labeling of a small step, engendering it with some sort of illogical inevitability that must grow to maturity.
It doesn’t matter if something is a “baby step”. It matters that steps are taken in the right direction.
This legislation is a step in the right direction.
It doesn’t matter if something is a “baby step”. It matters that steps are taken in the right direction.
It matters if we let that step be the only step, which Democrats do all too often.
As do Republicans. Your statement means nothing in practice.
This is a small, societally practical beneficial step.
That is what matters.
As do Republicans.
I resent the implication that I support Republicans.
This is a small, societally practical beneficial step.
And if we’re satisfied, Democrats will stop right here and progress no further.
That is a strange and illogical conclusion.
Why would you stop once you begin making progress?
Don’t stop. The fact that you are making progress implies that you can make further progress.
Why would you stop once you begin making progress?
I don’t know. Why did Democrats stop pushing for the minimum wage increase? Why did we stop pushing for codifying Roe? Why did we stop pushing for restoring the Voting Rights Act? Why did we stop pushing for the public option?
Democrats stop if you don’t apply pressure.
We all here blaming and shaming while forgetting that most of us are complicit in that we’ve taken, at best, baby steps to fix the situation as a whole. That is the entire overarching situation in the U.S.
Dems use ‘baby steps’ as an excuse for doing nothing, and when voters start getting loud about no progress they can reply with ‘it takes time’ Baby steps is how the DNC went from antiwar war to warmongering and centrists to right wing. Small unnoticeable steps to the right
Dems started 2021 with a 50-50 split in the Senate. In 2023 they no longer had the trifecta. Do you understand the limits of lawmaking?
This article feels a little like a backhanded compliment.
Yes, i really dislike the articles tone, as if we are children. Overall vibe is like Mom telling me how good broccoli is for me and anyhow im not eaving till i eat it anyway so id better get going before it gets cold
It’s especially frustrating because it seems to imply that Biden is owed fealty and gratitude because he did something good for the people. It’s the other way around. Biden owes the people good works, and good public policy. The cost of healthcare shouldn’t be as high as it is, and doing something about it is what we ought to expect of elected Representatives.
It also gives him credit for the pharmaceutical companies voluntarily offering insulin at the same price as Medicare pays. It is not due to regulation or negotiation, but a PR move designed to stave off actual regulations. Insulin is one drug, one example that was a perfect metaphor for the unfettered profiteering from the healthcare industry.
They don’t want the government to limit how much they can charge for insulin, because it wouldn’t stop with insulin. So they lower the price of insulin and let Biden dance around the ring with his arms raised like he knocked out the champ. Thank him! Praise him! He’s doing this for you, you ungrateful peasants! He’s not a misogynist or a fascist like the last guy, so you better be on your knees in front of his altar, or the bad guys are going to come back.
I mean, you don’t even have to click into the article to read that it was only “voluntary” because the government was about to enforce the new law and force them to lower prices. A law that was Biden’s BTW, part of the inflation reduction act. This would never have happened under a Republican.
One doesn’t have to be some kind of raving Biden Stan to acknowledge that his administration has been incredibly productive, both in terms of using damage that Trump did, and passing laws and using orders to move us forward. I think that’s all this article is trying to say.
Your rant at the end is weird, unhelpful, and uninformed.
“REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!! AFFORDABLE LIFE SAVING MEDICINE IS SOCIALISMMM!!!1”
-GQP
HISSSS…SOCIALISM!!! lol
FOX NEWS ALERT: BIDEN INCREASES PRICE OF INSULIN!
NEWSMAX BREAKING NEWS: VOTING FOR BIDEN CAUSES TYPE I DIABETES!
If there’s anything I’ve learned in the past several presidencies in my life time. Voters tend to disregard the beneficial efforts one president makes because of their party background. So even if Biden did this tremendous achievement, it’s still going to be watered down by the Republican cultists because it wasn’t a Republican who did this. They would’ve preferred a Republican to charge people $1,000 or more for insulin and while being told to be pulling up the boot straps to make the costs.
The $1000 insulin would be blamed on “Those People” who they decided to target that week.
Bbubut he’s 80 and cognitively impaired!
/s
They wont.
Of course they won’t. The types of people who oppose Biden mindlessly only either pay attention to news sources which will never cover this or they don’t consume news at all. They are idiots (largely) and to reach idiots takes something much more stark
Lets socialize pharmaceutical production these fucks are literally killing us and holding back life saving treatments for corporate profits.
Yeah, IDK if helping less than 1% of Americans is enough. If it makes sense for insulin why doesn’t it make sense for every other drug that big pharma has exorbitant prices for?
Well, any actual path from here to there can only be traveled one step at a time.
Cheaper for Boomers? Fucking goodie.
Still doesn’t negate him condoning and funding genocide, funding endless proxy war and starting another, and telling us we are not struggling while ignoring our pleas.
Listening to the masses? That’s the first step towards communism, you godless commie. listening to what the property and business owners say is what the fondant fathers and jesus died for
O let us love our occupations,
Bless the squire and his relations,
Live upon our daily rations,
And always know our proper stations.
Biden has been great
Great for the donor class, not so much for the working
Many people who need insulin aren’t on Medicare, of course. But now, non-Medicare patients also have access to cheaper insulin, thanks to the way another policy implementation has played out.
As of Jan. 1, the three companies that dominate the market (Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi) have all lowered prices and made some of their products available to non-elderly, non-disabled Americans for the same $35 a month that Medicare beneficiaries now pay. The companies announced these changes last year, presenting them as a voluntary action to show they want to make sure customers can get lifesaving drugs.
But by nearly all accounts, it was primarily a reaction to an obscure policy change in Medicaid, the joint federal-state program for low-income people. The effect of the tweak was to penalize drug companies financially if they had been raising commercial prices too quickly.
“This is a smart PR move and to some extent a response to market pressure… but drug companies are not lowering insulin prices to be generous,” KFF executive vice president Larry Levitt told me in an email. “They’re lowering prices to avoid paying rebates to Medicaid programs and therefore maximize profits.”
So if you’re not old or poor, continue to pay hundreds in either scam insurance fees or scam MSRP insulin prices lol.
Also I could be wrong, but I believe the old (medi-X) price was around $50-$60. So at least that’s an improvment.
Turns out Republicans are very efficient manipulators.
Or Democrats absolutely suck at messaging.
Or both…
All of meds went down since the beginning of the new year. Some of them significantly.
