Yeah, that would annoy me too.

  • blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not a native English speaker, but didn’t “jungle” in the past mean something more like “wilderness” instead of just “tropical rainforest”?

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, it derives from a Hindustani word that is basically “wilderness”. I’m not certain about older English usage, but given that original meaning it would make a lot of sense

      Weirdly enough, the Sanskrit word that Hindustani got it from is something closer to “desert”. Seems like if you go back far enough it actually specifically excludes tropical rainforests

  • CrazM13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Interesting thing to note: fire prone brushlands, which are often included in the public coloquial idea of savanna, are one of the few ecosystems with a comparable biodiversity to rainforests. Also, the difference between jungle and rainforest is that the tangle of undergrowth is larger, and sunlight is more able to breach the canopy, fueling that undergrowth. So, if we were willing to stretch these ideas to the absolute extreme, we could argue that the savanna - with fire prone brushlands included - is a jungle due to the heavy “undergrowth” fueled by the sunlight breaching an EXTREMELY sparse canopy.

    Or if we want to stick to reality, we can just accept the title is a bit of a misnomer lol

    • CustardFist@feddit.nlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      This started as a little pet peeve of mine, but over the years it has grown to a huge, hairy balled peeve, that has to live in the shed now.