Israel is still vowing to respond to Iran’s ballistic missile strikes a few weeks ago. It’s part of a terrifying tit for tat between the two regional superpowers that could widen an already escalating war. Meanwhile, Israel is believed to be a nuclear power with 90 warheads, although it refuses to acknowledge its nuclear program, and analysts say Iran could rapidly develop a nuclear weapon if it chose to. It’s part of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. Victor Gilinsky was a commissioner of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission under Presidents Ford, Carter and Reagan. And he told our co-host Michel Martin how Israel first produced a nuclear explosive device in the late 1960s.

VICTOR GILINSKY: They had a reactor that they got from the French that produced plutonium sufficient for bombs, had, you know, very smart people that knew how to design them. And they also, I think, had help from others, including Americans who had been involved in the program here and then went to Israel.

MICHEL MARTIN, BYLINE: And do we have a sense of what Israel’s nuclear capabilities are at this point?

GILINSKY: I don’t think we know a lot. We do know they have what we call a triad. You know, they can deliver them by a rocket, by airplanes, and their ultimate deterrent is on submarines. They have submarines that they got from Germany, which they’ve outfitted with long-range missiles tipped with nuclear warheads.

Archived at https://ghostarchive.org/archive/ZZx7H

Related news story from a few days earlier

The US is investigating a leak of highly classified US intelligence about Israel’s plans for retaliation against Iran, according to three people familiar with the matter. One of the people familiar confirmed the documents’ authenticity.

One of the documents also suggests something that Israel has always declined to confirm publicly: that the country has nuclear weapons. The document says the US has not seen any indications that Israel plans to use a nuclear weapon against Iran.

Related story archived at https://ghostarchive.org/archive/B9YuN

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    *Israel-Palestine war. Israel is attacking way more than just Hamas.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I fully expect Iran to decide to develop nuclear weapons after all the events from the past year. It’s become abundantly clear diplomacy will no longer keep Israeli aggression in check like it has in the past.

    • febra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I honestly don’t understand why not every country isn’t producing nuclear weapons at this point. Diplomacy has clearly been a complete farce for decades now. Countries like Israel can develop nuclear weapons without any repercussions, because the “civilized west”, while seemingly being so obsessed with international law when it comes to countries like Iran and North Korea, surprisingly tends to forget about whatever Israel is doing, and thus is only selectively applying said international law. In extension, international law is a farce, and is only of importance when it suits one of the superpowers sitting in the imperial core.

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I honestly don’t understand why not every country isn’t producing nuclear weapons at this point.

        Well, you see, Iraq was invaded and taken over based on a mere rumor that they were developing nukes

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Which they of course didn’t have, which is why they could be taken over like that in the first place. It kinda supports the point.

      • Sundial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s abundantly clear with the Ukraine example. They disarmed their nukes and both US and Russia agreed to respect their autonomy. A couple of decades later, Ukraine tries to join NATO, Russia says “absolutely the fuck not” and decides to invade them breaking this agreement.

        • febra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Pretty much. International law means nothing in the greater context as long as that benefits the superpowers.

  • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    MARTIN: It’s interesting, 'cause I covered the White House in the administration of George H. W. Bush, and I knew about it. But then when I’ve talked to colleagues about it, they didn’t know about it, and people are continually surprised.

    Maybe because news publishers like NPR and CNN never put that detail in the headlines of their stories that brush up against this open secret

  • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    There’s actually a very good reason for this, and it benefits everyone, including anti-zionists.

    For them to publicly acknowledge it, would force the hand of many countries in the region to develop their own programs, which could result in an uncontrollable nuclear arms race in the wider region.

    There’s a lot more game theory and realpolitik involved on the subject then I care to delve into on a comment, but there’s no shortage of white papers walking through it that anyone is free to read.

    So, speaking of someone who is looking forward to Israel’s upcoming demographic and economic implosions, I am still very happy they haven’t publicly acknowledged their nuclear arsenal.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Care to elaborate? If everyone knows they have nukes, that means everyone has the same incentive to develop a deterrence of their own or to ensure they don’t get on the wrong end of it through diplomacy. However given Israels plans to expand into a “greater Israel” occupying half of Egypt and Saudi Arabia, most of Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Iraq as well as a small part of Turkey, everyone in the region already has a strong incentive to arm themselves.

      • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        25 minutes ago

        Not really, because it involves condensing a lot of white papers on the topic of nuclear strategy.

        The policy itself is referred to, at least colloquially, as Israeli Nuclear Ambiguity. While that covers a lot of aspects of Israeli nuclear strategy, you probably want to look for papers that deal with how Israeli Nuclear Ambiguity and the US Nuclear Umbrella work together to impact nonproliferation in the wider region.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago
    CNN - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for CNN:

    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    NPR - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for NPR:

    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.npr.org/2024/10/23/nx-s1-5124713/as-the-israel-hamas-war-escalates-israel-refuses-to-acknowledge-its-nuclear-program
    https://edition.cnn.com/2024/10/19/politics/us-israel-iran-intelligence-documents/index.html

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support