• BossDj@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I can’t even imagine 100 years from now when gamers are dying every day.

    Right now I feel like I can change an account name and email pretty easily and nobody would care. But when that account is 130 years old, someone might start asking questions

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’ve actually been “maintaining” my Dad’s GOG account since he died some years ago. Anytime there’s a giveaway I log into both our accounts and download, one for me, one for him. No point to it really, just out of remembrance, though I’ll probably hand it off to one of my kids at some point.

  • WaterWaiver@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Title of PCGamer’s article is misleading, they want a court order to do it. Proof of death is not enough.

    “In general, your GOG account and GOG content is not transferable. However, if you can obtain a copy of a court order that specifically entitles someone to your GOG personal account, the digital content attached to it taking into account the EULAs of specific games within it, and that specifically refers to your GOG username or at least email address used to create such an account, we’d do our best to make it happen. We’re willing to handle such a situation and preserve your GOG library—but currently we can only do it with the help of the justice system.”

    They have to do that anyway. Court orders overrule a company’s policies in most (all?) legal systems.

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The fuck do they mean they will try?

      “Oh no there’s no way we could possibly break out of these invisible shackles we put on ourselves”

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        27 minutes ago

        It’s legal speech for “we want to however if we straight out say we’re going to do it no studio is going to want to release games on our platform”

      • WaterWaiver@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        The whole thing is vaguely and noncomittally worded, it promises basically nothing.

        Take this bit for example:

        taking into account the EULAs of specific games within it

        In other words: talk to the individual publishers of each game and get their permission :P At which point GOG’s involvement is almost irrelevant, if you have the publisher’s consent then they might as well give you a copy.

    • IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Isn’t this the same with any asset for probate? In the UK, you cannot just hand them a pinky promise IOU. If the person has 4 kids and a wife, who gets the steam library? Courts decide this.

      • WaterWaiver@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I would assume that court orders and proved wills have different levels of coercion when you present them to someone like GOG? Dunno. Each country probably has its own rules, including fun complexities like whether or not GOG was a party to the process or not.