• Qvest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Waste management and environmental concerns are already bad with coal power (even worse than nuclear power, in the sense that nuclear doesn’t launch waste into the air as far as I know, feel free to correct me if I’m wrong)

    Although, yes, security has to be higher for nuclear power, but nuclear is not as bad as most people think

    • Quatity_Control@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is no solution for nuclear waste. It’s buried underground it takes millennia to disperse the radiation. Don’t think there is anything worse environmentally.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can’t think of anything worse than radiactive material that has been solidified and shielded and buried far away from any living creatures, in the same way that tons of naturally-occurring radioactive material has for millennia?

        I mean… It could be dispersed into the atmosphere… like what happens when we burn coal, which inevitably has some radioactive materials in it cuz we dug it up from deep underground.

        • Quatity_Control@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, cos that radiation dispersal from fossil fuels, which is failing to turn us all into mutants since it is so low in concentration compared to nuclear waste, great comparison.

          Best check your nuclear storage. It hasn’t been doing well of late. B109 Hanford Nuclear Reservation leaking 1300 gallons a year. 200000 gallons already leaked from 67 tanks leaking.

          75% of US nuclear sites have leaks.

          Plenty more examples of your “safe” waste storage around.